STEM Junction
  • Home
  • About Me and My Blog
  • About Integrative STEM Education
  • Understanding NGSS
  • STEM Junction Store
  • Weblog
  • Contact

Robinson's Weblog

These are the ramblings of an inquisitive educator, as recorded in a fancy Weblog. Her continuing mission: to explore strange new insights, to seek out new understandings and new methods of creating engaging learning experiences, and to go boldly where many other educators are headed as well. ​

Happy Reading!

Robinson’s Weblog #010: What’s the Big Idea?  Part Four: The Big Ideas about Science (Understandings about the Nature of Science)

7/5/2016

0 Comments

 
In Robinson’s Weblog #007: What’s the Big Idea? Part One:A Framework for K-12 Science Education, I wrote that I think A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (National Research Council, 2012) does an excellent job of identifying and describing 1) the big ideas about science education 2) the big ideas about science, and 3) the big ideas of science. The framework directs how these ideas should be integrated into any new standards. Thus, the framework provided the guidelines for the development of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).

In this weblog entry, I will explore the “big ideas about science”. These ideas identify what science is and describe its characteristics. The NGSS refer to them as understandings about the nature of science (NOS).  Because science is both a body of knowledge and the process by which that knowledge is developed, the NOS describe the characteristics of scientific knowledge, and give the principles and ideas that describe science as a way of knowing.


This excerpt, quoted from the framework acknowledges the importance of NOS instruction.
“......Understanding how science has achieved this success and the techniques that it uses is an essential part of any science education ……….. there is a strong consensus about characteristics of the scientific enterprise that should be understood by an educated citizen.” ​
[NRC, 2012, p. 78]  

Pages 78 and 79 of the framework contain many other statements about NOS instruction, such  as this excerpt:
“Students need to understand what is meant, for example, by an observation, a hypothesis, an inference, a model, a theory, or a claim and be able to readily distinguish between them.” ​
[NRC, 2012, p. 79]  

The framework describes the content for K-12 science education and has three dimensions: scientific and engineering practices (SEPs), cross-cutting concepts (CCs), and disciplinary core ideas (DCIs).  These dimensions are the foundation upon which the architecture of the NGSS are built.  

Although the framework acknowledges the importance of the nature of science, it is not one of  its dimensions.  In comments on drafts of the NGSS, state leaders and the public wanted the inclusion of NOS in the new standards to be more explicit. In response, the NGSS writers included eight major themes or categories related to understandings about the nature of science. These are not a fourth dimension of the standards, but extensions of other dimensions.

The basic understandings about the nature of science are:
1. Scientific Investigations Use a Variety of Methods
2. Scientific Knowledge is Based on Empirical Evidence
3. Scientific Knowledge is Open to Revision in Light of New Evidence
4. Scientific Models, Laws, Mechanisms, and Theories Explain Natural Phenomena
5. Science is a Way of Knowing
6. Scientific Knowledge Assumes an Order and Consistency in Natural Systems
7. Science is a Human Endeavor
8. Science Addresses Questions About the Natural and Material World

The first four themes extend understandings most closely related to dimension 1 (science and engineering practices) and the last four themes extend understandings most closely related to  dimension 2 (crosscutting concepts) of the framework. NGSS Appendix H includes appropriate learning outcomes for each of these themes.


Although NOS is not a dimension per se, explicit instruction with these learning outcomes is an important part of NGSS three-dimensional learning. Integrating the practices(dimension 1) and crosscutting concepts (dimension 2) deepens student understanding of the core ideas of science (dimension 3). By learning about the NOS, students know not just what the core ideas are, but also how these ideas have been arrived.  Students who know not just the conclusions of science stated in the core ideas (“what we believe”), but also understand “how we know” and “why we believe” scientific evidence, have a more comprehensive view of science than if they learned the three NGSS dimensions alone.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    welcome to my weblog

    Here, I chronicle my journey to create engaging integrative STEM learning experiences for students. These weblog entries include tales from the front line of classroom teaching and online instructional design. ​

    Archives

    July 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

​© 2018 Crisden Learning Solutions LLC
Legal Notices
Photo used under Creative Commons from NASA Goddard Photo and Video